Advice on your Research Presentation for the
Jump
to:
While
each presentation will differ by topic, methodology, etc., there are some
general guidelines for “standard” psychology talks.
Your
presentation should be no longer than 10 minutes, leaving 5 minutes for
questions. Within that time frame, I’d suggest roughly the following
format:
Introduction: 2 minutes
Discussion: 3 minutes
Obviously
the above suggestions are flexible. For example, if you have very simple
methods and results that just don’t need 5 full minutes, you’ll be able to use
your extra time for the introduction and discussion.
Unlike your written work where you are
asked to provide a great deal of detail, and (in particular) an extensive
literature review, this talk will be a “boiled down” summary of your
work. As painful as it may be to NOT
discuss certain literature or, even, certain corollary hypotheses or questionnaires included in your research, you
need to figure out what your main point in your research is and just
present that.
In general you want to be precise in what you present, but present only the basic information that is needed to understand what you did, why you did it and what you found. Again, general guidelines:
Introduction: This should be a very
directed background briefly citing key studies leading up to your main
hypothesis. As succinctly as possible, you want to tell the audience “here is
what we know” and “here is the gap my project fills.” That being said, make
your opening sentence an interesting question or dilemma about human
nature/people… try to capture interest in the first sentence. Remember, in many
ways you are telling a story.
Method (& Results): In general you should just be presenting the basics
here – you can always answer questions about extraneous details at the end if
people are curious. The basics do
include, however, a quick run down of # of subjects, relevant demographics,
etc. Typically people first say what they did, then say what they found. Your
goal here is to be clear and concise so you should feel a bit of freedom to
organize this section in whatever way seems to tell the best story (note that
an audience at an oral presentation may have trouble remembering long, complex
methodological procedures by the time you get to results). In addition to the basics, you might
(depending on your project) want to “set up” any big qualifications or holes
you think people will see in your data.
You can follow up this “set up” in the discussion.
(Results &) Discussion: Often in talks there is not a sharp line
between results and discussion. A listening audience can’t keep track of more
than one or two results and may forget what you found by the time you get to
discussion. So, feel free to have what
feels like a normal “conversation” and discuss each result as you describe it
if appropriate. In general, however, you should eventually wind your way to a
pure discussion section. In that time do
one or two of the following three things:
note and discuss possible alternative explanations for your findingsy; note and discuss the
direction future research could take; and/or note and discuss how your results
add to or change the existing literature.
No matter what you talk about in the discussion, you should end up tying
your talk back to the opening of your introduction.
Extra Info. – You probably should have a page with extra
information handy. For example,
descriptive statistics, or “follow-up” analyses, etc. You won’t present these things, but it sure is
impressive when you can answer a question quickly with a precise number.
Visual Aids (18 point font at least)
You
must use visual aids to guide the audience through your talk– plan on a
PowerPoint slide show AND/or (backup) transparencies (available in the
bookstore; Connie & John have color printers if you have something you’d
like on a color transparency). If you
are doing powerpoint, you must have transparencies as
backup. You should probably have the following visuals:
Title slide – Title, your name and
Introduction slide – you should have at least
one slide with a few introductory points/citations.
Methods slide – you will probably have just a couple methods slides unless your
procedure is complex. You should include example items for surveys. Tip:
I’ve seen speakers put # of subjects, relevant demographics, basic descriptive
statistics, etc. on a slide, but then not actually present those things aloud
to the audience. Although you wouldn’t typically want to put something on a
slide and not talk about it, in this instance it is a nice way to both save
time and show that you did assess all those little details.
Results slide(s) – you will probably have several
results slide. Graphs and figures are GOOD.
Tables with lots and lots of numbers are not so good. You can put
significance levels, F or t values, etc. in smaller print on these slides. You don’t need to “prove” to the audience
that you understand stats by announcing how every finding is significant
because p < .05, but you should have statistical info. handy in case
anyone asks. Right on the slides is a
convenient storage place.
Discussion - you may want to have a slide or two with a
few points for discussion.
All
visual aids should look professional.
USE AT LEAST 18 POINT FONT FOR EVERYTHING INCLUDING NUMBERS,
TABLES AND EXAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRES. Try
for the biggest font you can. Note: LESS = MORE.
No need to put every last thought on a visual. No need for complete sentences even. Think bullet points and topic phrases… No need to list excessive citations on your
slides either. An audience should be able to “look at” your
transparency. If they must “read”,
then they will stop listening!! Also, be
sure to provide your audience with enough time to examine any detailed
information you do put up.
“I don’t know.” Say
it now, out loud.
You
will (trust
us) know “the” answer, or “an” answer (or that fact that there is no answer) to
most questions you are asked. However,
“I don’t know” is also a perfectly legitimate response. Your honesty will be appreciated more than
posturing. BUT, that being said, there
are multiple ways to say “I don’t know” including:
“That’s
an interesting question. What do you think?”
“I
haven’t considered that option, I’ll have to think about that – thank you for
the suggestion.”
(Then write down whatever they said if you actually think it has merit).
When you “kind
of” understand what they are asking…
“I’m
not sure I understand exactly what you are asking – could you say that again?”
“I’m
not sure I am completely following your question, but let me say this and see
if it addresses the problem…” [follow with information you think is related; then ask them if that
addressed their point].
“I’m not actually familiar with Theory X, but this may speak to your
general point…” [follow with information related to their
question].
By
the way, SILENCE is not your enemy. Remember, you are the expert who has read
all the literature and spent a year thinking about your topic. It is perfectly
legitimate to listen to a question, pause, breathe, think about all that stuff
you know and then respond. Your more thoughtful
response will be appreciated.
Here are a few tips regarding presentation style, etc.
· PRACTICE
PRACTICE
PRACTICE
· Your audience will be top-notch college students
such as yourself. Don’t assume an intimate acquaintance with psychology topics,
but you can assume a basic understanding of scientific research,
hypothesis-testing, etc.
· Presenters I’ve seen typically have stapled
pages of paper with them more often than note cards – emphasizing the slightly
more informal tone of most psychology presentations (you are sharing
information, not dictating a speech).
· Try not to read your talk, but if you must –
attempt to make eye contact occasionally.
Actually write in your notes if you have to: MAKE
EYE CONTACT HERE
Then highlight that spot so you can find your place
on the page easily when you look back down.
Also if you must read, try to not SOUND like you are reading! Go slow, breathe, and pause at appropriate
intervals.
· You’ll likely be in a small
classroom like the ones here at
· Practice working with the overheads, even if
it is in your bedroom. Write in your
talk: OVERHEAD #1 if needed. This will help you remember when to put what
up.
· PRACTICE
PRACTICE
PRACTICE
· Try to not have to worry about covering up
part of your overheads as you go. If you do want to do that though, use sticky
post-it notes you can place ahead of time.
· When pointing at things on the overhead,
walk over to and point at the screen if
possible, not the slide on the actual overhead machine. (When people do the latter, their bodies
typically block the screen for some portion of the audience. I once saw a man
point at the slide on the machine for the entire talk and his shoulder blocked
the projection lens so all we ever saw was a big shadow and his wrist moving
around!!)
· Dress professionally but casually and be
comfortable. No jeans, no tennis
shoes. Women: slacks are fine or a skirt
if you prefer; Men: ties are optional if you have an outfit that is “nice”
without a tie. Go ahead and take the time/effort to pick out an outfit you feel
confident and comfortable in. After
you’ve done that, you can then forget about what you are wearing and focus on
the important stuff!
· PRACTICE
PRACTICE
PRACTICE
· RELAX!!!
This is NOT a firing squad. It is
a bunch of people who thought your talk sounded kind of cool from the abstract.
They are interested in your interesting project.
· Be confident!! You know your project better
than anyone else in the room. You are the expert. This is your chance to show
off your excellent work!
J
Good luck – we know you’ll all do great!!
J
y DO NOT downplay the quality of your research. Start by assuming that what you found is “truth”AND that your reasoning for your hypothesis was top notch. The reason why we encourage you to talk about problems/alternative explanations is because a psychologist holds an opinion as long as the evidence supports it and is always open to new evidence. Thus, your job is to try to discuss what could have caused the gap between your reasoning and your results. Also, you don’t want to seem clueless about potential problems with your conclusions. But, do not undercut your reasoning and work when you discuss possible problems.